Understanding Sexy
{Originally published at To Thither and Whither}
Apparently, I don’t “get” sexy
At all. Because what passes for “sexy” today…is so not.
For example, yesterday I was clicking through the channels trying to find something halfway decent to watch on the old telly. That’s when I came across the movie, “The Transporter II.”
Now normally, action flicks with lots of martial artistry and heavy weaponry aren’t really my thing, but there was nothing…else…on. So, I decided to stare at it for a minute or two.
Enter evil lingerie-clad woman.
She wants to kidnap this kid. Apparently, she really doesn’t like children, so she does what any other self-respecting child disliker would do.
She kidnaps this kid.
In her underwear.
At first I was very confused.
Did her clothes get wet and she was waiting for them to dry? Did they get dirty and she threw them in the laundry? Was the weather exceptionally hot that day? Had she torn her clothes in a fit of passion and not had the time to mend them?
Why was she in her underwear? I was so concerned about this I could not focus on what was happening in the movie. The only thing I cared about was figuring out what happened to her disappearing clothing. WHERE-OH-WHERE could it have gone?
I finally gave up, figuring she hadn’t had much on in the first place. So, I tried to follow the sequence of events as the violence unfolded.
“Tried to” is the key phrase there.
It just didn’t make sense to me why she would decide to kidnap a child in her pink bra and panties with the black lace edging. WHY? You couldn’t have thrown some sweats on? You’re dealing with a child here. What if he decides to vomit or snot all over you? Then what? Something like that is not going to come out of those delicates any too easy.
What was even more confusing was why she had paired her ensemble with a pair of five inch fire-engine red stiletto heels.
Woman, who let you go out the door in that?
What was even more baffling (yes, it gets worse) is that I believe the movie was tring to pass the woman off as sexy.
Lingerie does not make a woman sexy.
Nor does the makeup job of a crack addict.
She looked like a street person running around in some very expensive “sexy little things.”
But, if the movie was motivated to create this character on the premise that “sex sells,” they failed miserably.
There was nothing sexy about any of it. Anywhere. And trust me, I tried to find it.
Another reason I don’t “get” sexy?
I read this report online today about Victoria’s Secret revamping their look. (Thank heavens.)
Apparently, they want to make it classier and more feminine. They want to leave behind the image of being “too sexy.” (Double thank heavens.)
Apparently, the entire premise for Victoria’s Secret came about because the man who started the company wanted to be able to buy lingerie for his wife without feeling creepy and skeevy.
Okay, good idea…but then why would the company resort to selling lingerie that caters primarily to prostitutes? What’s not creepy and skeevy about that? Ever think about the woman in the equation? Ever think that she’d prefer not to feel creepy and skeevy when she goes to buy lingerie for herself? I mean, I can’t even look in the store windows or through a catalog or on their Website without accusing myself of being an all-out slut n’ whore for three days straight afterwards. And that’s just when I’m looking at their SWIMWEAR.
Classier? More feminine? Uh, YA THINK? I applaud the efforts of the company to change their image, but HOW COME NO ONE EVER THOUGHT OF THIS BEFORE?
My point? I don’t really have one…except to say that apparently, my definition of “sexy” is so very different than that of everyone else in the world.
Apparently, I don’t truly understand the meaning.
Or maybe I do, and it’s everyone else who’s a big idiot.
I have been reading Sue (and vice versa) for almost 3 years and I can emphatically state that To Thither and Whither is one of my all-time favorite blog reads. Her blog is also one of the the true, underappreciated and hidden GEMS of the Internet. Simply put, Sue is just a great writer. It is frosting on the cake that she has an extremely fresh, unique sense of humor.When I read this submission it was no different. Girlfriend makes me laugh my ass off. (Yes. Yes, I really did just type that. Sigh.)
I love that she is very clear with her beliefs and is not afraid to share them. (And a lot of them are very different from mine.) As a very devout Christian with a fierce feminine streak, Sue is full of the unexpected. She has a huge, generous heart and I adore her AND her blog. I highly suggest giving her and her archives a read!






























Very funny! I concur that her clothes were probably in the laundry.
That was very refreshing, like “Hey, the Emperor has no clothes on”. Reads like an expose of our present culture. Loved it!
This is hilarious! I enjoyed the first Transporter, but felt my forehead crinkling during the second one for much the same reasons. And, I agree, I used to like Victoria’s Secrets, but they seemed to change. I keep trying to go in there, and walk out empty-handed.
Heathers last blog post..Where the Wild Things Are
[...] Comments Jo on Does. Not. Compute.Understanding Sexy | Blog Nosh Magazine on Understanding Sexycindyinsd on Does. Not. Compute.Froyd on Does. [...]
[...] on my RSS feeds and waiting for my very delayed flight back to Madison, I came across a blog post - Understanding Sexy. Honestly, it was a little bit cliche. The old idea that a woman’s not sexy if she’s [...]
I’m proud of you for finally getting noticed for your talent! Understanding sexy? Why I think you do ;). I cant wait to read more of your writing. I think we’ll be seeing much much more of you!